BBC:

Lord Phillips, the court's president said he had lost by a majority of five justices to two.
The court ruled the extradition request had been "lawfully made".
However, Mr Assange's lawyers have been given 14 days to consider challenging the ruling, saying it could have been reached unfairly.
Dinah Rose QC, for Mr Assange, said the Supreme Court's decision could have been made on legal points not argued during the appeal - and she needed time to consider asking the court to reopen the case.
'Judicial authority'
Mr Assange, who has been on conditional bail in the UK, did not attend the hearing in central London. His lawyer later told reporters he had been "stuck in traffic".
Comments
Mr Big is at it again
May 30, 2012 by Irlandos (United Kingdom ), 50 weeks 5 days ago
Points: 0
The case against Mr Assange is almost laughable. I am worried that he is being tried for something other than sex offences...
Should've thought of this
May 31, 2012 by Jim Adams (United States ), 50 weeks 4 days ago
Points: 4
'Whacking' him would have been a whole lot easier. And probably would've made more sense. You can't start a fight with everybody in a bar and then expect to get out unscathed. He should've thought of this before.